Why Does EMF Radiation Harm Us?

 

Although EMFs have not been proven to cause harm, studies indicate that long-term exposure might trigger manifestations. If your bedroom’s EMF levels are higher than the acceptable limit, it is a good decision to shift your bed. If your bedroom’s EMF reading is high, you may want to consider changing your sleep position. You should also be aware that the specific health effects of EMFs are not fully understood. The research will surely improve our understanding of EMFs’ health impacts in the coming years.

ICNERP Position statement on EMF radiation

International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection has debunked new science-based evidence on the dangers caused by radiofrequency energy. Although the Commission has received a variety of comments on the Monograph however, it has not made any changes to the position statement, or its own members. The scientists mentioned, as well as other experts have made clear that ICNIRP cannot be considered an independent scientific agency.

Michael Repacholi was first to head the ICNIRP. He has done minimal research on electromagnetic fields. Repacholi was the one who suggested to the World Health Organization launch an EMF research program in 1995. The WHO has appointed her as the Observer to the Main Commission of the ICNIRP. The statements she made are in line with the ICNIRP’s views regarding EMF radiation.

The COIs for the ICNIRP shows that the vast majority of scientists were funded from industry. For example, Anders Ahlbom was a director of his brother’s company for consulting, Gunnar Ahlbom AB, which is focused on telecom and environmental regulation. He did not include the name of his brother’s business on the Declaration of Interest.

ICNERP further recommends that EMF guidelines are internationally agreed upon and supported by evidence. Guidelines were created by the ITU and World Health Organization to limit exposure to electromagnetic fields. These guidelines were designed to safeguard the public from any health risk that is known to exist. The compliance standards define the procedures used to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields below levels that are recommended. IEC62209 is the global standard for compliance with mobile phones.

The position statement of the ICNIRP on EMF radiation is a good instance of a suspicious organization. Although the ICNIRP is a non-governmental organization, it is funded by industry and is not legally accountable for its decision-making. The ICNIRP relies also on a set of safety guidelines it created. The ICNIRP is not an independent science agency, and instead is an industry lobbying organization. This study’s findings in general do not show much in the way of positive effects for human health.

Ionization

Scientists have found a link in EMF exposure and cancer. In the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified non-ionizing EMFs in the radiofrequency range as Group 2B. This includes cellphones, tablets Smart devices, smartphones, and wireless networks. The IARC is a specialization group of scientists that convenes periodically to evaluate the risk to health of the various types of EMFs.

EMFs from low- to mid-frequency comprise electric and magnetic fields that are stable throughout time. These are generated from appliances and electrical power lines. EMFs of low to mid-frequency can be considered to be non-ionizing and therefore are safe for health. Radiofrequency EMFs has lower energy and generally does not cause harm. The sources that emit EMFs have lower levels than radiofrequency spectral constituents.

Non-ionizing EMFs can be found in microwaves and radio frequency radiation. They have a similarity to natural rays that break chemical bonds. Non-ionizing EMFs can be found in diverse environments and can have diverse effects on health. Being exposed to EMFs can impact the ability of devices to handle electrical signals. Scientists believe that some ionizing radiation may cause cancer.

The results of research have demonstrated that EMFs created by high frequencies may cause heat to build inside the body. Although some studies have demonstrated that exposure to radiofrequency EMFs may cause significant damage, there is no definitive data to confirm the quantity of exposure to radiation that is needed to trigger serious health concerns. And although the literature lacks clear evidence for the lowest doses of radiation needed for harm to happen There are numerous studies which show that the heat generated is safe.

Carcinogenicity

There’s currently a debate over whether electromagnetic fields can cause cancer to humans. Researchers at the National Toxicology Program (NTP) investigated the effects from EMF radiation on leukemia breast cancer, as well as brain tumors in male rats and mice. The results differ from one study to the following, most likely due to variations in research design, and results are inconsistent among various cancer types as well as exposure indices.

Numerous studies have been done and many are not of high-quality. Finding that RF EMFs could cause cancer has been proven by numerous studies. One of the first studies was conducted by the US National Toxicology Program, studying the consequences of exposure to GSM and CDMA on rats. Ramazzini Institute also conducted a study that tested for the possible carcinogenicity of radiofrequency EMFs that emanated from base stations.

In the past it was reported that the EPA released an official report that examined 70 studies covering 2008-2018. While this report focuses primarily on cancer research, it covers various other health hazards that could be a concern like psychiatric or neurological disorders. Researchers are still conducting investigations into the impacts EMFs on human well-being. It is possible to adopt measures to minimize the exposure of our bodies to EMFs at low frequencies. Although there’s no evidence to suggest that these fields are responsible for cancer among humans, researchers will continue to monitor the effects of EMFs and our health.

EMFs which have higher frequencies are more harmful for humans as they could cause DNA damage and death of cells. The researchers have concluded that EMFs of this frequency isn’t harmful. But, some studies have found that low-frequency EMFs could be harmful to our health. Furthermore, they might influence the brain’s functioning. These are some of the questions that surround EMFs.

DNA Impact

Research has revealed a connection to EMFs at high frequencies and cell damage including DNA damage. X-rays and gamma rays are high-frequency EMFs which can harm DNA directly. They can harm DNA through alteration of DNA strands. But, it’s not evident from the way EMFs impact DNA or the cells in humans. However, a combination of both elements is speculated.

Studies have shown that RF-EMF exposure may result in DNA damage in the human sperm. Mobile phones are commonly situated near the reproductive organs and Bluetooth devices might enhance their exposure to radiation, this results in DNA damage. Apart from the damage caused by DNA, these systems could alter the levels of proteomic of male reproductive systems. Numerous studies in the past have demonstrated that RF-EMF can result in DNA damage to human the spermatozoa. The majority of these research studies however, have used male mice in order to evaluate the impact that RF-EMFs could have on DNA.

Autophagy plays a key role in cellular response to environmental stress. Autophagy is a cellular process that enables a cell to repair DNA damage. In RF-EMFs, AMPK and mTOR pathways are activated that triggers autophagy. ROS is also reduced by autophagy. Hence, the RF-EMFs may alter DNA damage.

Recent studies have indicated that RF-EMFs of 1800 MHz may cause autophagy to occur in mouse cell spermatocytes. In addition, this is controlled by ROS, which can be harmful to DNA. The good news is that melatonin inhibits ROS even in the presence of EMFs with RF. Melatonin inhibits autophagy. It could be a key factor to reduce DNA injury.

Prevention

To determine the potential risks to health from EMF exposures, it is essential that living tissue absorbs energy of EMFs. The power that is absorbed can be measured as a function of the relevant dosimetric quantity (SAR). Because it indicates the amount of energy absorbed by the body, the specific energy absorption rate (SAR) in the case of EMFs that are less than six GHz can be crucial.

The risk of exposure to EMFs as well as the chance of developing leukemia in kids has been proven to some studies. Other studies have found no correlation to EMF exposure and other cancers that affect adults as well as children. Numerous parents allow their children to use cell phones, despite the potential dangers. The long-term EMF exposures have yet to be examined to determine whether they can harm youngsters. Avoid long-term exposure to EMFs and to use headsets with wires.

Health effects caused by EMFs with radiofrequency are primarily related to the increase in temperature. Though the rise in temperature is one of the main factors for health-related effects but studies have shown that slight increases could be detrimental. Temperature increases are influenced by a number of elements, including ambient temperatures as well as the pace of work and the clothing. While mild heating can feel pleasant, excessive heat can be unpleasant. Health effects from radiofrequency EMF exposure aren’t fully comprehended.

The study of exposure to RF has been carried out through an organization called the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The National Institute for the Occupational Safety and Health’s Engineering and Physical Agents Effects-Hazards Branch (EPH-H) conducts safety-related RF studies. In addition, the WHO’s EMF Project also develops standards for exposure to radio frequencies. To minimize negative effects on your health, it is crucial to understand the risk factors associated with RF exposure.

Protect your health and well-being

At Be your best self, we get a small commission from this link to support our blog

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.